Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
07-21-2013, 11:48 AM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sanger
Age: 35
Posts: 392
|
I know with my set up I ran my buddies steeda cai and bama race tune. Both cars had 3.55s and I walked him by about 2 cars.
I wish mine was a factory freak.
__________________
2014 sterling gray 5.0 mustang gt. MT82, 3.55 gears with few mods
1973 mercury comet 347ci Jerico 4 speed tranny
1978 mercury Capri 2.8l German v6
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 12:31 PM
|
#2
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 39
Posts: 2,405
|
It seems to me, that 3:31's are better for hwy pulls. I would like to run you. I live in Gainesville. I have JLT CAI and bama tunes, AB's.
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 01:59 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Sanger
Age: 35
Posts: 392
|
Yea I like 3.31s as well. I wanted 3.55s for road racing. THat would be a good run. Im about to start working in sanger again so ill be closer
__________________
2014 sterling gray 5.0 mustang gt. MT82, 3.55 gears with few mods
1973 mercury comet 347ci Jerico 4 speed tranny
1978 mercury Capri 2.8l German v6
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 02:03 PM
|
#4
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Mustang, Ok
Posts: 259
|
I had LTs on the car before the blower and the gains through the curve were much better than the stockers. peak power wasn't a huge gain like everyone expects. its power under the curve that really matters... the boss mani doesn't really add power either. It moves the power curve as well. The sound alone to me was worth the money. The gains post blower install make it even better.
__________________
2015 Comp Orange GT Premium Perfomance Pack
SOLD!
2012 Kona Blue GT Premium
Roush TVS/JLT Big Air
Stainless Works Long Tubes and catted X.
Magnaflow Competition Catback
AED Tuned
***Driver Mod***
10.88@134 on street tires
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 02:10 PM
|
#5
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 35
Posts: 3,367
|
Bc I said worth it. I have more power through the curve and I'm going boost. Also have a lot less money in mine then you think
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough  4-0 vs Steve 
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 02:28 PM
|
#6
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 39
Posts: 2,405
|
Originally Posted by Midnight11
Bc I said worth it. I have more power through the curve and I'm going boost. Also have a lot less money in mine then you think
|
Baragin hunter huh! LOL Btw how you like the K springs? Are they straight bolt on or do you need Diff dampers?
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 03:19 PM
|
#7
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Roanoke, Texas
Age: 40
Posts: 818
|
LTs are probably the most costly bolt on mod you can do, outside of major suspension components or forced induction, due to initial part cost and labor,(most people have them installed due to the difficulty of the installation). The peak gains won't be huge on our cars. Our exhaust manifolds are actually a lot more efficient than previous Mustang GT models. You will however build your power curve up no matter what, regardless of the peak HP gain. I think it is a great part to offset the low end losses from a boss manifold too. They are even better in S/C setups as you will obviously be pushing more air and better exhaust flow will naturally net you more power.
__________________

Airaid CAI | Borla S-Type Catback | Amsoil 10w30 and MTG Trans. Fluid
382hp 387ft/lb | 1/4: 12.9 @ 112mph
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 03:31 PM
|
#8
|
Banned
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Gainesville,Tx
Age: 39
Posts: 2,405
|
Originally Posted by Dan12GT
LTs are probably the most costly bolt on mod you can do, outside of major suspension components or forced induction, due to initial part cost and labor,(most people have them installed due to the difficulty of the installation). The peak gains won't be huge on our cars. Our exhaust manifolds are actually a lot more efficient than previous Mustang GT models. You will however build your power curve up no matter what, regardless of the peak HP gain. I think it is a great part to offset the low end losses from a boss manifold too. They are even better in S/C setups as you will obviously be pushing more air and better exhaust flow will naturally net you more power.
|
I agree for F/I setups the benfits are pretty apparent.
|
|
|
07-21-2013, 03:35 PM
|
#9
|
El Presidente
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Always ahead of Steve
Age: 35
Posts: 3,367
|
Originally Posted by re-rx7
I agree for F/I setups the benfits are pretty apparent.
|
And you wonder why I said worth it. I'm going fi
__________________
2013 Ford Mustang 5.0 6M Brembo 3.73s
HPP TUNED HP-enough  4-0 vs Steve 
|
|
|
07-23-2013, 12:54 AM
|
#11
|
Junior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Garland, tx
Age: 42
Posts: 21
|
I don't know anything about the 5.0. I know my car went from 301rwhp to 333rwhp after my longtubes were installed. I say that's a good increase. Only issue I have is ground clearance.
__________________
2010 gt. Performance mods: ford racing hot rod cams, American racing longtube headers, 3" high flow catted American racing x-pipe, 3"piping back to borla type-s mufflers, ford racing k springs, Shelby sway bars, adjustable panhard bar, brembo shocks/struts, sumitomo 285/35/18 rear tires. cosmetic:gt4 replicataggered set, smoked raxiom headlights(galos off), raxiom tail lights.
|
|
|
07-23-2013, 11:32 AM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 496
|
My car is supercharged and I'm just running cat deletes. I'm sure that long tubes would help me, but I'm not sure if it's worth the money. Most increases you see are from going stock to longtubes, not cat delete or offroad H/X to longtube. I'm thinking I might see another 20rwhp and am not sure it's worth it for that little.
__________________
2012 GT/CS KB2.8LC 596/487
|
|
|
07-24-2013, 10:53 AM
|
#13
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by Doug1227
My car is supercharged and I'm just running cat deletes. I'm sure that long tubes would help me, but I'm not sure if it's worth the money. Most increases you see are from going stock to longtubes, not cat delete or offroad H/X to longtube. I'm thinking I might see another 20rwhp and am not sure it's worth it for that little.
|
I understood it that LTs on a FI car helped out much more than on a n/a car.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
|
|
|
07-24-2013, 11:01 AM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 42
Posts: 1,896
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
I understood it that LTs on a FI car helped out much more than on a n/a car.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk 2
|
That is definitely true. Also work better on larger displacement motors. It is common place to see 18-25rwhp and similar torque on LS1s using 1 7/8s headers without a cam. I could see adding larger tubing if there was a big cam involved.
-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376
Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
|
|
|
07-25-2013, 10:08 AM
|
#15
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 60
|
why are a larger diameter headers not worth as much on these cars? Dark Pony hit the nail on the head. These motors, while badass, are still only displacing 302 ci.
same reason a larger throttle body isnt worth anything.
How much you pick up from an aftermarket part is based on how crappy the stock stuff is. So the fact that one doesn't really gain a significant amount of power from stock is a testament to how good the stock stuff is. The other part of the equation is velocity.
Ill take a smaller primary tube header with a good exhaust velocity and keep my torque. we're talking about street cars here right?
__________________
2011 Mustang GT Grabber Blue
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|