General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here. |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
07-17-2013, 04:46 PM
|
#16
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Yea, cause you don't even own is consider fast. People with 70k dollars plus cars with 30k plus into it and you rode in them is fast. Man anything with 700 rwhp is fast.
|
That's your opinion, I disagree.
My junk is slow and always will be. I'm okay with it. lol
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 04:48 PM
|
#17
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
That's your opinion, I disagree.
My junk is slow and always will be. I'm okay with it. lol
|
Your junk is slow cause its basically stock. I said 700 rwhp plus is fast. And god damnit why do you have to derail every thread.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 04:51 PM
|
#18
|
My Stapler!
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dtown
Posts: 1,928
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Man anything with 700 rwhp is fast.
|
I disagree.
__________________

2012 GT/CS
93 Cobra
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 04:53 PM
|
#19
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by Phuck Phace
I disagree.
|
What needs to be lower for you?
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 04:53 PM
|
#20
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Ok Steve. Smh
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Not this shit again.
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Your junk is slow cause its basically stock. I said 700 rwhp plus is fast. And god damnit why do you have to derail every thread.
|
You have an accountability issue there, Jeff. I believe you started the derailment with the top two posts and David came along fueling it.
Back on topic -
Yes, 400tq is very common. I think it really depends on what kind of dyno you were on. Some are more generous than others.
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 04:56 PM
|
#21
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
You have an accountability issue there, Jeff. I believe you started the derailment with the top two posts and David came along fueling it.
Back on topic -
Yes, 400tq is very common. I think it really depends on what kind of dyno you were on. Some are more generous than others.
|
Yeah I said after you and Nic. Do you have selective reading?
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:01 PM
|
#22
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Yeah I said after you and Nic. Do you have selective reading?
|
I posted my numbers and agreed with Nic. You just don't like my opinion. That is fine, get over it and let the thread go on.
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:03 PM
|
#23
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I posted my numbers and agreed with Nic. You just don't like my opinion. That is fine, get over it and let the thread go on.
|
And when I post something you guys always post something afterwards. So do what you preach.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:12 PM
|
#24
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
It's hard to compare dyno numbers between cars unless they were both dynoed on the same day, and dyno, with as close to the same exact weather as possible, and the dyno tech hit the trigger at the exact right moment on both cars.
Just too many factors to come into play. (You like this post don't you Steve? Lol)
It also depends on how the TQ values are determined. A calculated TQ value done from the load on the dyno (like Brooks') may be way off from one calculated by RPM sensor and such like TS does.
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:16 PM
|
#25
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
|
Car 1 and Car 2 weigh the same, have the same gearing, same tires, and twin brothers driving.
Car 1 makes 400tq at 2500rpm and 400hp at 6500
Car 2 makes 375tq at 2500rpm and 425hp at 6500
Car 2 wins the race every time, assuming the driver knows that you don't let the engine drop to 2500rpm during a race.
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:19 PM
|
#26
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
|
Originally Posted by 46Tbird
Car 1 and Car 2 weigh the same, have the same gearing, same tires, and twin brothers driving.
Car 1 makes 400tq at 2500rpm and 400hp at 6500
Car 2 makes 375tq at 2500rpm and 425hp at 6500
Car 2 wins the race every time, assuming the driver knows that you don't let the engine drop to 2500rpm during a race.
|
Are we talking about a dog or roll race? LOL
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:22 PM
|
#27
|
Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Fort Worth
Posts: 60
|
Originally Posted by DirtyD
It's hard to compare dyno numbers between cars unless they were both dynoed on the same day, and dyno, with as close to the same exact weather as possible, and the dyno tech hit the trigger at the exact right moment on both cars.
Just too many factors to come into play. (You like this post don't you Steve? Lol)
It also depends on how the TQ values are determined. A calculated TQ value done from the load on the dyno (like Brooks') may be way off from one calculated by RPM sensor and such like TS does.
|
I get what your saying. But my car was was within 5-6 hp and 5 ft lb on Brooks' dyno on a hotter day, so I would consider that an accurate measure. I understand the variation between weather and dynos and what not and that of course, makes sense.
my thing is I believe a street car that makes 30 ft lb across the board will be faster than a car that makes 20 or so at the very top of the tach.
__________________
2011 Mustang GT Grabber Blue
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:22 PM
|
#28
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Wtf? Damn you guys know how to derail a thread. Lmao and by the way car two would win from a roll or dig.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:23 PM
|
#29
|
Member
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 60
|
I have over 400 tq
|
|
|
07-17-2013, 05:26 PM
|
#30
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 43
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by jrhagen
I have over 400 tq
|
So do I even with the boss intake.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
|
|
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
Display Modes |
Linear Mode
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|