![]() |
Dyno Numbers Question
I learned a bit more about dynos yesterday; there are a few different types. I didn't realize there were even different types of Dynojets (STD/SAE). Anyway one thing I didn't expect to see was the same horse power number as I had in the past. Here is some history: My wife bought me a dyno session with HPP back in February (pretty sure it was colder then). The car was bone stock, still had temp tags :) It put down 382/359. Pretty reasonable. This was on a STD dyno. So yesterday I dyno with an added Air Raid intake and full Borla S-Type Catback. I dynoed 382/387 yesterday. I picked up a significant amount of torque but I thought it was odd my horsepower remained exactly the same. Now I know several other things factor into this like altitude, air temp, etc and it was on a different dyno. I just thought it was odd the HP didn't move at all, up or down. I expected a little bit more considering what I have done so far. I know I hardly have anything done for performance but this just kinda threw me.
|
The factory air box flows well, and if you havent tuned for a CAI and used a bigger MAF then you will not see a gain in power. The exhaust will benefit the low end torque and your running the same program as your initial dyno run
There are also always differences between dyno's. i picked up 10HP/15TQ from my dyno at HPP. It was also not 103* like my first session and the DA was better yesterday. Had a guy with a GT500 that dyno'd at gearheads 2 weeks ago with full TVS setup and did 575/575, yesterday he did 640/640 which is where it should be |
As mentioned that Cai will do nothing for you without removing the restrictor in the maf and getting a tune to take full advantage.
|
I guess the factory air box is built quite well then. I have heard this before too. I guess this proves it quite well for me. Now I guess I just need to decide if I want to bite the bullet and throw away the warranty for a tune.
|
Tuning hasn't ever voided a warranty on any car I've ever owned. It can cause grief if your service manager is a prick, but if you have a good one that understands what a tune actually does, you shouldn't have any issues.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have heard though that the cause of failure what ever it may be must be linked back to what modification was done to cause the failure. Obviously an engine tune won't cause something somewhere else like in the differential to fail spontaneously. It seems like such a grey area... blah.... sooo tempted to tune... |
Its the magnusson moss act, they basically have to prove that the modification caused the failure of said part to void the warranty. It can get to be a long ugly battle...
Also realize if you bought an extended warranty when you purchased your car that you can cancel it at anytime for any reason. They have to refund you a prorated balance of unused warranty by law. Did after i ported my shelby's blower after I had the car for 2 years and still got back $1500. Dealers hate this cause it comes out of their bottom line and gets charged back to the finance dept. if they void your warranty, then cancel it on them and get a portion of your money back. |
STD and SAE are correction factors available on all dynos, not actual different dynos. The most common 2 types of dynos are dynojet and mustang. Mustang typically reads lower than dynojet, but even dynojets will vary a little one from another. Not sure what all influences this but certain tuners are known for having higher or lower numbers than others.
|
STD dyno numbers are what your car out down at that exact time, on that day, in those conditions. Basically incorrect end. Colder atmosphere yields higher STD numbers that a hotter atmosphere. SAE applies correction factors to the numbers to account for atmospheric conditions, locations, etc. So as long as the car is dynoed in the same configuration in both conditions, the SAE numbers should read pretty close to each other (within 5 HP I'd say...)
|
Quote:
|
I always understood STD to be the uncorrected form. Thanks for clarifying that, Toby.
It still seems that SAE reads a more realistic number to me. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
In the current state of the hobby, there is way too much emphasis put on dyno numbers. It's just a tool to tune a car, but more often than not it's used as a way to equate how fast a car is going to be which isn't true at all. The only true way to do that is race. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.