![]() |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
You gotta change the oil a lot on E85 too, due to significant water absorption. I wouldn't go much further than 2k miles myself, but I'm sure the E85 pros will chime in on their thoughts as well. This is a crankcase catch can after 100 miles of running E85 on a boosted Evo: http://farm6.static.flickr.com/5262/...31c7d1c9_z.jpg |
Every fuel option has upsides and downsides. E85 is an awesome alternative for cars that need a high octane rating and some street use. It has some maintenance issues and it's hard on fuel systems, although the '11+ Mustangs don't seem to have an issue with it.
I never like mixing fuels, not because it's going to mess up some secret 'formula' for maximum performance, but because it's just a pain in the fucking ass. Driving to the gas station, putting some 93 in the car, then going back home and putting the right amount of 110 in it... think I'll pass. |
Quote:
However, if you're looking at building a monster, there is always going to be some extra work and hoops to jump through. You gotta pay to play! |
Quote:
|
I'll just roll with 93 and throw some race gas in at the track when I'm beating on it.....
|
Quote:
Jeff, besides fuel mileage (which surely you know about before running it) what makes you think E85 "didn't work" for you? Your car seems like a perfect candidate for it. Are you disappointed with your numbers? Are the numbers better with race fuel? Since I'm not "in the loop" with the current status of everyone's car I have no idea why you're so anti-E85. Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Ever had rice pudding, that shit is nasty?
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:37 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.