![]() |
I'm not one to really stick up for Jeff since he did talk massive shit before last night so he had some of this coming. But are some of you guys really comparing autos stalled cars with no seats that go to the track every weekend to a guy with a full weight car with a new combo and also his first time to the track with it., let not forget a stick.
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
I have a Honda that hangs around our shop that makes 498fwhp... It traps 140mph in the 1/4 mile..... How do you figure that? Well I will tell you, power to weight is everything in drag racing. Jeff claims his car weighs over 3850 with out him in the car. That would make it over 4000lb with him in the car going down the track. Weight will kill mph..... My fox body back in the day made 400rwhp (1996) weighed 3196 with me in it and traped 128.8mph. You have to quit taking the times the fast guys on the Internet are runing and thinking that a little higher dyno number should make a heavy car not set up to track with a new driver should run with the educated and prepared racer. Raw power will not over come weight and set up |
You have got to be kidding me. There's the no interior BS again. Hello? What are you going to do with a rear seat when you have a roll bar? Yes the passenger seat is pulled, nobody else does that? Yes when at the track it has a far safer driver seat in it to properly accommodate the harness, nobody else does that?
Everyone knows the back seat doesn't weigh shit. The passenger seat is around 45lbs. That driver seat saves about 20lbs. Then there's the part no one seems to want to talk about, the weight added right back in from all the safety equipment, that car is 100% legal to 10 flat. That car is no lighter than it would be with the stock seats present and the aftermarket shit not present. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
The difference in knowing your car and not is doing all your own work vs. paying someone else to do it for you. Also having experience racing and knowing how to put a good combination of parts together helps. One that that floors me is how much money people waste on bright shiny objects. Just to name a few: MMR head cooling mod CAI's Intake manifold heat shields Any JLT product ...the list goes on. I didn't run 10's the first time out with my car but I did run 11's with a tune, tires/wheels and the passenger seat removed. The car was bone stock down to the mufflers outside of those changes: As my car sits, the only change I make to it between street and track are wheels/tires and I put the radio antenna back on. That's it. I use the same tune and everything else to drive with on the street. http://i632.photobucket.com/albums/u...0GT/IMG047.jpg For the car being gutted, I addressed that in this post: http://www.dfw50s.com/showpost.php?p...&postcount=299 I know you are not being confrontational but wanted to clear a few things up. :waytogo: Thanks for stopping by to chat last night. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
For Christ's sake....my head hurt now.
wbt, why did you mention the JLT products? They have been proven to perform, of course with the addition of a tune. I know the stock airbox is a damn good piece on these cars, but can you explain? I'm actually curious. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
1. Their CAI design on the 2011+ cars is flawed. 2. Their catch cans have issues with fittings breaking. 3. The company owner has such a large ego he refuses to admit when his products have issues yet he is willing to make video's about other vendors ripping him off. Our CAI testing: http://www.modularfords.com/threads/...signal-quality Catch can issues: http://www.svtperformance.com/forums...ken-again.html http://forums.themustangsource.com/f...-issue-521192/ ...plenty more out there. His video's: This video showed/proved nothing. ....and much more going on behind the scenes that isn't as public. For me that says everything. If others are happy running his products that is their prerogative. That's my opinion. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:25 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.