Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-01-2013, 06:04 PM   #61
STROKD
Old School
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Age: 46
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
I'm not just running pump gas. I'm adding torco to it.
I have a couple 5 gallon pails of Torco Id sell if interested. Wont be using it in either of the Stangs.
__________________
86 GT 374 Billet "W" w/ 72MMs
90 GT 351 Dart short stroke w/ YSi
STROKD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:06 PM   #62
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by STROKD View Post
I have a couple 5 gallon pails of Torco Id sell if interested. Wont be using it in either of the Stangs.
How much? And why aren't you using it?
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:19 PM   #63
46Tbird
Senior Member
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
Default

Originally Posted by 04sleeper View Post
It won't hurt my feelings if you don't want to run E85. I just want to help you understand there are drawbacks with anything.
Exactly.

You gotta change the oil a lot on E85 too, due to significant water absorption. I wouldn't go much further than 2k miles myself, but I'm sure the E85 pros will chime in on their thoughts as well.

This is a crankcase catch can after 100 miles of running E85 on a boosted Evo:

__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
46Tbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:36 PM   #64
46Tbird
Senior Member
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
Default

Every fuel option has upsides and downsides. E85 is an awesome alternative for cars that need a high octane rating and some street use. It has some maintenance issues and it's hard on fuel systems, although the '11+ Mustangs don't seem to have an issue with it.

I never like mixing fuels, not because it's going to mess up some secret 'formula' for maximum performance, but because it's just a pain in the fucking ass. Driving to the gas station, putting some 93 in the car, then going back home and putting the right amount of 110 in it... think I'll pass.
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
46Tbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:45 PM   #65
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
Every fuel option has upsides and downsides. E85 is an awesome alternative for cars that need a high octane rating and some street use. It has some maintenance issues and it's hard on fuel systems, although the '11+ Mustangs don't seem to have an issue with it.

I never like mixing fuels, not because it's going to mess up some secret 'formula' for maximum performance, but because it's just a pain in the fucking ass. Driving to the gas station, putting some 93 in the car, then going back home and putting the right amount of 110 in it... think I'll pass.
I agree completely. If my car was a daily, I'd leave it on 93 for sure. And really, if someone is looking for a hassle free set up then a full out build car probably isn't for them anyways or at the most going up to the point where its as far as you go on 93 octane.

However, if you're looking at building a monster, there is always going to be some extra work and hoops to jump through. You gotta pay to play!
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2013, 06:47 PM   #66
STROKD
Old School
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Age: 46
Posts: 1,358
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
How much? And why aren't you using it?
dont need it, cars make good pwr on pump (600 for the slow one and bout double that for the less slow one)... dont need it anymore.
__________________
86 GT 374 Billet "W" w/ 72MMs
90 GT 351 Dart short stroke w/ YSi
STROKD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 11:07 AM   #67
Doug1227
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 496
Default

I'll just roll with 93 and throw some race gas in at the track when I'm beating on it.....
__________________
2012 GT/CS KB2.8LC 596/487
Doug1227 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:07 PM   #68
46Tbird
Senior Member
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
Do any of those 900 rwhp has 13:1 compression. I bet all of them are boosted. Like I said boosted and low compression cars has great success and worth the e85. NA and high compression is a different story.
So I am curious...

Jeff, besides fuel mileage (which surely you know about before running it) what makes you think E85 "didn't work" for you? Your car seems like a perfect candidate for it. Are you disappointed with your numbers? Are the numbers better with race fuel? Since I'm not "in the loop" with the current status of everyone's car I have no idea why you're so anti-E85.

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
I filled my mustang with e85 and ran like shit. Convince me it's the best stuff ever.
So the tune was a problem? Seems like maybe you should consider having it tuned by someone else, just to see if there is a difference. The fuel was certainly not a problem - there are E85 and flex fuel vehicles in use all over the country that don't have drivability problems.
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
46Tbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:11 PM   #69
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
So I am curious...

Jeff, besides fuel mileage (which surely you know about before running it) what makes you think E85 "didn't work" for you? Your car seems like a perfect candidate for it. Are you disappointed with your numbers? Are the numbers better with race fuel? Since I'm not "in the loop" with the current status of everyone's car I have no idea why you're so anti-E85.
I knew about the mileage but it dropped a lot more then expected. And the idle sucked on it. It die on me a lot which before with cams and pump gas it never did. If I get below a 1/4 of a tank it felt like my engine was starving and it would die on me EVERY TIME I came to a stop. So it might be just my build I don't know but people I have talk to and TS has talk to, no one has had any luck with e85 and bump compression or my kind of build.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:15 PM   #70
46Tbird
Senior Member
 
46Tbird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 697
Default

Originally Posted by BLK2012GT View Post
I knew about the mileage but it dropped a lot more then expected. And the idle sucked on it. It die on me a lot which before with cams and pump gas it never did. If I get below a 1/4 of a tank it felt like my engine was starving and it would die on me EVERY TIME I came to a stop. So it might be just my build I don't know but people I have talk to and TS has talk to, no one has had any luck with e85 and bump compression or my kind of build.
Bad idle and dying when coming to a stop is not an E85 issue. Is someone working on getting the pump gas / race gas tune done? I'm interested in knowing the numbers and how much the drivability improves.
__________________
"If this was like, a thousand years ago, I'd be a Picasso. I'd be one of those dudes that cut his damned ear off."
46Tbird is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 12:30 PM   #71
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

Originally Posted by 46Tbird View Post
Bad idle and dying when coming to a stop is not an E85 issue. Is someone working on getting the pump gas / race gas tune done? I'm interested in knowing the numbers and how much the drivability improves.
Yes and should have numbers by this end of this week.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 03:53 PM   #72
StormTrooper
Super Moderator
 
StormTrooper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 390
Default

Ever had rice pudding, that shit is nasty?
StormTrooper is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 04:11 PM   #73
GTRacerX
Senior Member
 
GTRacerX's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Arlington, TX
Age: 39
Posts: 212
Default

Originally Posted by GTRacerX View Post
What all is involved in changing over to E85 on the coyote motors. I know a tune would be required, but what about the fuel lines and injectors etc.?
Thanks for answering my question everyone
GTRacerX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 04:12 PM   #74
blownaltered
I have a small penis
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Making Steve my bitch since 2003
Age: 43
Posts: 1,465
Default

Originally Posted by GTRacerX View Post
Thanks for answering my question everyone
from what I gather injectors and a tune. The lines are fine. But I don't have a coyote so if you really want to know pm 04sleeper
blownaltered is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2013, 04:14 PM   #75
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by GTRacerX View Post
Thanks for answering my question everyone
Minimum 47# injectors and a tune. Talk with 04sleeper. But as its said before, for a daily driver it isn't the smartest move if you are worried about economy.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump