Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > Performance

Performance Post anything performance related to your Mustang


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-10-2014, 06:44 PM   #1
mtaylor7210
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Age: 38
Posts: 28
Default Ford's intake manifolds

Interesting article comparing all of the ford manifolds for sale.
http://www.nmradigital.com/2013/12/1...e-5-0l-engine/

The boss and cobrajet definitely need bigger cams/ head work.
mtaylor7210 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 07:28 PM   #2
kdanner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 178
Default

Originally Posted by mtaylor7210 View Post
Interesting article comparing all of the ford manifolds for sale.
http://www.nmradigital.com/2013/12/1...e-5-0l-engine/

The boss and cobrajet definitely need bigger cams/ head work.
Not much need for head work when NA CJs are running 9.70s with unported GT heads in Stock Eliminator, and they aren't showing everything they have. Cams yes, in fact I'm pretty much of the opinion now that if the cams can be controlled via VCT still, they aren't big enough.
__________________
NA 2011 GT Auto
[email protected]
Texas Mile - 152.8 half mile/180.0 mile
kdanner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-10-2014, 11:05 PM   #3
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 40
Posts: 1,896
Default

From what I have read, the results of this test were pretty standard issue. Thanks for sharing the article.

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 07:18 AM   #4
fordplay
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: fort worth
Posts: 234
Default

So boss gains hp but loses tq and you need to spin to 7,500 to use it. The CJ intake makes more hp then both and matches the base tq numbers.. I see zero reason for the boss intake any more right?
fordplay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 07:48 AM   #5
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 40
Posts: 1,896
Default

Originally Posted by fordplay View Post
So boss gains hp but loses tq and you need to spin to 7,500 to use it. The CJ intake makes more hp then both and matches the base tq numbers.. I see zero reason for the boss intake any more right?
Werd. Old news really. Seen these tests done independently from guys over on another forum.

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 08:45 AM   #6
rlhay2
Senior Member
 
rlhay2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 119
Default

It would be interesting to see what stock cams, the Cobra Jet manifold and a turbo would do.
__________________
07 TT GT500 w/misc supporting mods
rlhay2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 10:45 AM   #7
TrueStreetTim
DFW5.0s Preferred Vendor
 
TrueStreetTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by fordplay View Post
So boss gains hp but loses tq and you need to spin to 7,500 to use it. The CJ intake makes more hp then both and matches the base tq numbers.. I see zero reason for the boss intake any more right?
The CJ increase has a lot to do with the TB and not solely the intake itself. If you have the BOSS ported you stand a good chance of regaining some of the lost tq and come out cheaper than a CJ and TB. Also; the production CJ intake has been worked and differs from the one you will get off the shelf.
TrueStreetTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 01:55 PM   #8
03MachMe
Senior Member
 
03MachMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
Default

Originally Posted by fordplay View Post
So boss gains hp but loses tq and you need to spin to 7,500 to use it. The CJ intake makes more hp then both and matches the base tq numbers.. I see zero reason for the boss intake any more right?
The boss intake was not designed for drag racing. It's for road racing where you spend a lot longer period of time in the upper RPMs and the raised redline can help prevent needless shifts. In road racing peak tq numbers are not the biggest concern so they don't bother with worrying about it. If you want to drag race the road race designed boss IM is not the best option no lol
__________________

2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
03MachMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 02:18 PM   #9
TrueStreetTim
DFW5.0s Preferred Vendor
 
TrueStreetTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by 03MachMe View Post
The boss intake was not designed for drag racing. It's for road racing where you spend a lot longer period of time in the upper RPMs and the raised redline can help prevent needless shifts. In road racing peak tq numbers are not the biggest concern so they don't bother with worrying about it. If you want to drag race the road race designed boss IM is not the best option no lol
TrueStreetTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 02:29 PM   #10
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by 03MachMe View Post
The boss intake was not designed for drag racing. It's for road racing where you spend a lot longer period of time in the upper RPMs and the raised redline can help prevent needless shifts. In road racing peak tq numbers are not the biggest concern so they don't bother with worrying about it. If you want to drag race the road race designed boss IM is not the best option no lol
Originally Posted by TrueStreetTim View Post
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 02:35 PM   #11
Dominic Toretto
Senior Member
 
Dominic Toretto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Irving / Oklahoma City
Age: 40
Posts: 1,896
Default

The CJIM should still be an improvement over the Boss in road racing since it still increases power and torque across the rpm band. So it's still better than the Boss regardless.

-Alex
__________________
2012 GT Premium Hardtop with XX Transmission
Mods page: http://dfw50s.com/showthread.php?t=3376

Ford Racing . Pypes . BMR . CDC . American Muscle . DDM Tuning . BFG . J&M . Amsoil . MMD. JLT
Dominic Toretto is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 04:33 PM   #12
TrueStreetTim
DFW5.0s Preferred Vendor
 
TrueStreetTim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: McKinney
Posts: 676
Default

Originally Posted by Dominic Toretto View Post
The CJIM should still be an improvement over the Boss in road racing since it still increases power and torque across the rpm band. So it's still better than the Boss regardless.

-Alex
TrueStreetTim is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-11-2014, 09:57 PM   #13
Antothoro
Senior Member
 
Join Date: May 2013
Posts: 109
Default

I appreciated the side-by-side comparison and technical review of the effects. I wish there was some different manifolds for the 4.0s.
__________________
2009 V6 -- BBK CAI, BBK TB, GT500 STB
Antothoro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 04:16 AM   #14
BLK2012GT
Scared to race Steve
 
BLK2012GT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
Default

No one has time for V-6's. Hell the aftermarket world is still learning about the coyote.
__________________
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT View Post
I agree. A stick car shocks the tires MUCH harder and does it several times going down the track. With a big power stick car, the car is much more unsettled going down the track making it more of a challenge to ET well. A well running auto car is nothing more than just point and shoot. Which is great for a track car taking a lot of driver error out of the equation.
BLK2012GT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-12-2014, 07:54 PM   #15
garner
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Harker Heights, TX
Age: 29
Posts: 377
Default

Originally Posted by Antothoro View Post
I appreciated the side-by-side comparison and technical review of the effects. I wish there was some different manifolds for the 4.0s.
There's a few out there but most are $$$
garner is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump