General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here. |
Sponsored Ads |
|
Welcome to DFW50s.com
|
Register to remove these ads.
08-18-2013, 10:51 PM
|
#1
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 638
|
Cross Talk beat that shit up and down
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 10:56 PM
|
#2
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Age: 40
Posts: 915
|
Originally Posted by Bearded Banger
Cross Talk beat that shit up and down
|
wish we had a like button on the boards.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 10:52 PM
|
#3
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
|
Post your time slip Jeff
__________________
2010 GT500
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 10:54 PM
|
#4
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by Yagermeister
Post your time slip Jeff
|
Why everyone saw what I ran. My best was a 12.3 at 117 mph with a 2.0 60ft
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:05 PM
|
#5
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Why everyone saw what I ran. My best was a 12.3 at 117 mph with a 2.0 60ft
|
I'm pretty sure you went 114 and Clint went 119. Dale has the video so I'm sure we will find out for sure.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:08 PM
|
#6
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by SlowGreyGT
I'm pretty sure you went 114 and Clint went 119. Dale has the video so I'm sure we will find out for sure.
|
Sent you a text Foo
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:17 PM
|
#7
|
I> /\/\
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Sent you a text Foo
|
Ok, I stand corrected. Jeff went 117. Not bad at all.
|
|
|
08-19-2013, 12:24 AM
|
#8
|
Senior Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Dallas/Plano
Age: 34
Posts: 561
|
Originally Posted by BLK2012GT
Why everyone saw what I ran. My best was a 12.3 at 117 mph with a 2.0 60ft
|
I did a 13.2 @ 113 with a 2.1 60' so don't feel too bad
__________________
2014 Oxford White 5.0 MT-82
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 10:55 PM
|
#9
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 178
|
Wait a minute. This is a manual base GT? I don't care if it is 100% untouched with stock wheels/tires and all, that car doesn't even weigh 3600 without driver. Get a new scale.
Why are you running a radial tire, any radial tire, on a stick car, then complaining it won't hook? You put the wrong tire on!
Here's the splits needed to go 10.80s from a 1.55 60':
60-330 2.9409
60-660 5.4026
60-1000 7.5251
60-1320 9.319
330-660 2.4617
330-1000 4.5842
330-1320 6.3781
660-1000 2.1225
660-1320 3.9164
1000-1320 1.7939
Splits for sticks are quicker than that down low, automatics get to take advantage of a radial tire and are quicker downtrack. You've got at least 75 more RWHP according to you, so you should absolutely slaughter every single one of those numbers. So let's see em.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 10:58 PM
|
#10
|
Supporting Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Age: 40
Posts: 915
|
Originally Posted by kdanner
Wait a minute. This is a manual base GT? I don't care if it is 100% untouched with stock wheels/tires and all, that car doesn't even weigh 3600 without driver. Get a new scale.
Why are you running a radial tire, any radial tire, on a stick car, then complaining it won't hook? You put the wrong tire on!
Here's the splits needed to go 10.80s from a 1.55 60':
60-330 2.9409
60-660 5.4026
60-1000 7.5251
60-1320 9.319
330-660 2.4617
330-1000 4.5842
330-1320 6.3781
660-1000 2.1225
660-1320 3.9164
1000-1320 1.7939
Splits for sticks are quicker than that down low, automatics get to take advantage of a radial tire and are quicker downtrack. You've got at least 75 more RWHP according to you, so you should absolutely slaughter every single one of those numbers. So let's see em.
|
i feel like im in science class.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:01 PM
|
#11
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 178
|
Originally Posted by OG Fox
i feel like im in science class.
|
LOL. I try to be scientific. I'm known to say "If you don't have data, you're a loser". That is a true statement in more than one way.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:01 PM
|
#12
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: DFW
Posts: 638
|
Originally Posted by kdanner
Wait a minute. This is a manual base GT? I don't care if it is 100% untouched with stock wheels/tires and all, that car doesn't even weigh 3600 without driver. Get a new scale.
Why are you running a radial tire, any radial tire, on a stick car, then complaining it won't hook? You put the wrong tire on!
Here's the splits needed to go 10.80s from a 1.55 60':
60-3302.9409
60-6605.4026
60-10007.5251
60-13209.319
330-6602.4617
330-10004.5842
330-13206.3781
660-10002.1225
660-13203.9164
1000-13201.7939
Splits for sticks are quicker than that down low, automatics get to take advantage of a radial tire and are quicker downtrack. You've got at least 75 more RWHP according to you, so you should absolutely slaughter every single one of those numbers. So let's see em.
|
Ill choose answer C.
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:03 PM
|
#13
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by Bearded Banger
Ill choose answer C.
|
"Summer School"
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:07 PM
|
#14
|
Senior Member
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Plano TX
Posts: 383
|
Just post the two little pieces of paper already
__________________
2010 GT500
|
|
|
08-18-2013, 11:11 PM
|
#15
|
Scared to race Steve
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Hiding from Steve
Age: 42
Posts: 2,646
|
Originally Posted by Yagermeister
Just post the two little pieces of paper already
|
For what purpose Brent?
|
|
|
Posting Rules
|
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts
HTML code is Off
|
|
|
|
|