Go Back   Dallas Fort Worth 5.0 Mustang Club > 5.0 Mustang Forum > General Discussions

General Discussions Discuss anything in general about your 5.0 Mustang that doesn't belong within the other categories here.


Sponsored Ads
Welcome to DFW50s.com

Register to remove these ads.




Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 07-03-2013, 09:18 AM   #1
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

A slightly revised tune on the 2013 gave them a smoother low end TQ curve, and also they "gained" 8 crank HP, but no one is sure where that was accomplished at (squirters or tune revision)
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 10:42 AM   #2
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
A slightly revised tune on the 2013 gave them a smoother low end TQ curve, and also they "gained" 8 crank HP, but no one is sure where that was accomplished at (squirters or tune revision)
LOL, the slight bump in power was due to the loss of windage and not a tune revision.

The 13+'s do also have the smaller head bolts which doesn't really effect power. There have been a few reports here and there about a head lifting under big boost applications but those are few and far between.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:10 AM   #3
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Steve View Post
LOL, the slight bump in power was due to the loss of windage and not a tune revision.

The 13+'s do also have the smaller head bolts which doesn't really effect power. There have been a few reports here and there about a head lifting under big boost applications but those are few and far between.
Hey, that is the information that was discussed when the 13s came out and were starting to be analyzed. I never saw anything else to to combat that theory. I'm just posting what I've heard. It is has been shown the TQ curve is smoother through the low RPMs though. It would make sense that a slight decrease in rotational weight would let the motor produce more work over the same time.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:11 AM   #4
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
I'm just posting what I've heard.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:14 AM   #5
03MachMe
Senior Member
 
03MachMe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Wylie
Age: 36
Posts: 2,266
Default

Originally Posted by Steve View Post
because your posting on the extensive number of motor builds you have done one 11-12s and 13s????
__________________

2013 Deep Impact Blue GT Premium
386rwhp/383rwtq
03MachMe is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:16 AM   #6
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by 03MachMe View Post
because your posting on the extensive number of motor builds you have done one 11-12s and 13s????
You're missing my point.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:14 AM   #7
DirtyD
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 5,594
Default

Originally Posted by Steve View Post
Okay, so if I said "I have read that it is supposedly...", would that have gone over better with you.
DirtyD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2013, 11:17 AM   #8
Grandpa
I> /\/\
 
Grandpa's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: A fender ahead of BlownAltered
Posts: 7,562
Default

Originally Posted by DirtyD View Post
Okay, so if I said "I have read that it is supposedly...", would that have gone over better with you.
Ha..nice.
Grandpa is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks




Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump