Might as well try my luck: job searching

[DirtyD]

I might see if a guy I know from my F150 days might have a lead at Lockheed.

Unfortunately, I think the economy really hit the the aero industry the most, especially engineers. Nobody really wants new planes right now, just fox the old ones until everything else is fixed. -__-

[brtnstrns]

Originally Posted by DirtyD I might see if a guy I know from my F150 days might have a lead at Lockheed. Unfortunately, I think the economy really hit the the aero industry the most, especially engineers. Nobody really wants new planes right now, just fox the old ones until everything else is fixed. -__-

Yeah, the industry is definitely crazy. But it's been that way since the beginning. Lockheed is so incredibly competitive that I don't really even attempt to look at them anymore (I was definitely not a top of the class type student). Obviously, it would be totally awesome to work for Lockheed, but they tend to lean towards people that graduated with crazy GPAs and tons of internship experience. Unfortunately, I wasn't one of those students.

[DirtyD]

Originally Posted by brtnstrns Yeah, the industry is definitely crazy. But it's been that way since the beginning. Lockheed is so incredibly competitive that I don't really even attempt to look at them anymore (I was definitely not a top of the class type student). Obviously, it would be totally awesome to work for Lockheed, but they tend to lean towards people that graduated with crazy GPAs and tons of internship experience. Unfortunately, I wasn't one of those students.

Honestly, the way I see it, I would rather hire and engineer that still has some to learn but already has people skills and is a book worm when it comes to design. I know a lot of the higher GPA CEs I went to school with that will most likely end up doing strictly research either academically or in the field. To me, someone that is more practical, even if less to offer on the smarts said, is more useful because they can actually think broadly, instead of "this is what I learned in school, so it's the only truth" type mentality. Those types of engineers tend to look to far into the theory, and not in a broad enough perspective.

[brtnstrns]

Originally Posted by JDBishopArts I'd keep trying Lockheed. Also Bell Helicopter. There are also a TON of aviation/aerospace companies in Addison. I drive by them all the time. I'll get some names of places if I pass again.

That would be great! I'd love to get some names of smaller companies that aren't as easy to find!

Originally Posted by DirtyD Honestly, the way I see it, I would rather hire and engineer that still has some to learn but already has people skills and is a book worm when it comes to design. I know a lot of the higher GPA CEs I went to school with that will most likely end up doing strictly research either academically or in the field. To me, someone that is more practical, even if less to offer on the smarts said, is more useful because they can actually think broadly, instead of "this is what I learned in school, so it's the only truth" type mentality. Those types of engineers tend to look to far into the theory, and not in a broad enough perspective.

That's good to know and that's definitely the type of engineer that I am. Most of the guys I studied with and college just did engineering because they were good at math. I did engineering because I've always worked on the things I own by myself and like getting my hands dirty. I wasn't the best at regurgitating information onto a test (I also wasn't horrible - I never got a D or anything, just wasn't a straight A student), but I'm pretty damn good at applying what I learn practically and thinking about design problems with the operator or assembler in mind, since that's how I personally work on my own property.

[DirtyD]

Check this site as well.

http://www.d-fwmall.com/aerospace.htm

I spoke with my firend I mentioned earlier, and he just said to check the public job listings that Lockheed posts on their website.