It's all a secret....

[wbt]

...no weight reduction even though you can see a reflection of the gay white plasti-dipped Racestars in his pics.....

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/2011-2014-mustangs-354/973305-new-pb-should-have-took-sh-t-could-have-cracked-9s.html

http://www.svtperformance.com/forums/2011-2014-mustangs-354/973030-rpr-friday.html

Ignore the .046 difference in 60' with the "special" tune.... Weather conditions and track conditions played no part.

...another example of 0 integrity dipshits.

[BLK2012GT]

So what's the problem? What does he have done?

[Courtesy Flush]

So what's the problem?

pretty clear if you read that svtp thread.

TexasStang is nutswingging AED for this magical 60 ft drag tune.

-His car is a 6M and he states he launching at 1100 rpms with traction control on.
edit** my bad his car is an auto. Still.... Turn the nannies off and poof better 60ft. I still dont understand how this guy got a slick to turn over with traction control on.
The tune played no part in a better 60 between runs, but as you can see people on that site buy into anything.

[wbt]

So what's the problem? What does he have done?

If you read the first post in that thread he stated:

"no weight reduction whatsoever"


pretty clear if you read that svtp thread.

TexasStang is nutswingging AED for this magical 60 ft drag tune.

-His car is a 6M and he states he launching at 1100 rpms with traction control on.
edit** my bad his car is an auto. Still.... Turn the nannies off and poof better 60ft. I still dont understand how this guy got a slick to turn over with traction control on.
The tune played no part in a better 60 between runs, but as you can see people on that site buy into anything.

+1

[BLK2012GT]

Gotcha

[garner]

Actually he said the tc do the work. TC could also stand for torque converter, just saying